Reconstitution of Mutant V2 Vasopressin Receptors by Adenovirus-mediated Gene Transfer
| Title: | Reconstitution of Mutant V2 Vasopressin Receptors by Adenovirus-mediated Gene Transfer |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Schoneberg, Torsten; Sandig, Volker; Wess, Jurgen; Gudermann, Thomas; Schultz, Prof. Dr. Med. Gunter |
| Publisher: | Journal of Clinical Investigation |
| Date Published: | September 15, 1997 |
| Reference Number: | 153 |
|
To return to this page, use your "back" key. |
This translation by the NDI Foundation is to assist the lay reader. To provide a clear, accessible interpretation of the original article, we eliminated or simplified some technical detail and complicated scientific language. We concentrated our translation on those aspects of the article dealing directly with NDI. The NDI Foundation thanks the researchers for their work toward understanding and more effectively treating this disorder.
© Copyright NDI Foundation 2007 (JC)
Mutations may occur at any point in a GPCR, and it is now known that mutations in GPCRs can result in human disease. Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) is such a disease. It is characterized by the kidney's inability to concentrate urine, and its primary symptoms include chronic, excessive thirst and urination. The most common form of inherited NDI is called X-linked NDI, and though females carry the mutated gene responsible for the disorder, it is males who, for the most part, manifest it. In this form of NDI, the vasopressin receptor (V2R), a member of the GPCR family, cannot bind to the antidiuretic hormone, vasopressin (VP). The result of this is that the message of vasopressin, which is to tell the kidney to begin the process of concentrating urine, is not delivered to the effector, resulting in a water balance disorder manifesting as NDI.
Working in the laboratory with cell cultures, Schoneberg, et al., discovered that they could get certain V2Rs, which due to mutations had lost their ability to function, to work again. They did this by finding the portion of the V2R where the mutations were, which in this case was in the tail end of the V2R. In fact the nature of the mutation was such that it resulted in the tail of the V2R being cut short (truncated). Then they took non-mutated tails of other V2Rs and mixed them with a virus that would carry them to where the mutated V2Rs were in the cell. The researchers found that when both the mutated V2Rs and the non-mutated V2R fragments were present together (co-expressed), then the mutated V2R was able to perform a significant amount of its function. This is something it could not do alone in its mutated state. What the authors wanted to know through their current research was the underlying molecular mechanism that allowed this restoration of function to occur.
They found that the non-mutated V2R fragment, called the V2-tail, directly interacted with the mutated V2R. That the V2-tail would associate directly with the mutant V2R, but not with other classes of GPCRs containing similar mutations (truncated tails) showed the highly specific nature of this interaction.
Finding this co-expression strategy worked in the specific cell line they used in the laboratory (the COS cell line), the researchers wanted to test its therapeutic potential by carrying out the strategy on select animal cell lines. Toward that end, they used Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines that had low levels of functionally inactive mutant V2 receptors (again, with truncated tails). They infected these cells with a virus carrying the healthy V2-tail gene fragment. The researchers found that the CHO cells that were thus infected showed a marked increase in their ability to generate an important metabolic regulator called cAMP9, a function dependent on the V2R being able to bind with vasopressin (VP). This indicated that the V2Rs in the infected cells had much of their ability to function restored. This was because in their mutated state they could not bind with VP, therefore the cAMP generation process could not be initiated.
Next the researchers wanted to know if their co-expression strategy could be used in the cells of kidney tubes because in diseases like NDI, V2Rs, mutated or not, live in select cells in the kidneys. They used a cell line of dog kidney (the little tubes that help filter water and other bodily fluids). They found that after the cells were infected with the V2-tail fragments and incubated, the cells demonstrated a 9.4 fold increase in cAMP levels, again indicating that the mutated V2Rs' ability to function properly had been restored. This strategy, then, holds therapeutic potential and should be further tested and explored.



